<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carberry and Resurrection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.italker.org.uk/2008/06/carberry-and-resurrection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.italker.org.uk/2008/06/carberry-and-resurrection/</link>
	<description>Life, as seen from Bo&#039;ness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iTalker</title>
		<link>http://www.italker.org.uk/2008/06/carberry-and-resurrection/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>iTalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.standonline.org.uk/italker/2008/06/24/carberry-and-resurrection/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>I believe that the present owners of Carberry are trying to make the house pay for itself. I&#039;m told that the last three years of the festival ran at a loss which the management of Carberry absorbed. This wouldn&#039;t surprise me because I know when the Church of Scotland ran the house it was heavily subsidised both by National Mission and the Board of Education.  I&#039;m told that the present plan is to create a place that would be more attractive to guests from a higher income bracket. The Festival  also had camping opportunities. This service it is felt can no longer be provided due to health and safety restrictions. The management of Carberry have encouraged the Festival to try using Gartmore House they believe it is a better fit for what the Festival wishes to accomplish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the present owners of Carberry are trying to make the house pay for itself. I&#8217;m told that the last three years of the festival ran at a loss which the management of Carberry absorbed. This wouldn&#8217;t surprise me because I know when the Church of Scotland ran the house it was heavily subsidised both by National Mission and the Board of Education.  I&#8217;m told that the present plan is to create a place that would be more attractive to guests from a higher income bracket. The Festival  also had camping opportunities. This service it is felt can no longer be provided due to health and safety restrictions. The management of Carberry have encouraged the Festival to try using Gartmore House they believe it is a better fit for what the Festival wishes to accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Lochhead</title>
		<link>http://www.italker.org.uk/2008/06/carberry-and-resurrection/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Lochhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.standonline.org.uk/italker/2008/06/24/carberry-and-resurrection/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>why has the carberry festival ended?  Has Gartmore House Trust found other users of CT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why has the carberry festival ended?  Has Gartmore House Trust found other users of CT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

