Seeking the Unity of the Church a tall order for tall people

This is a post to encourage all the 40 Day Discipleship Challengers. Don't beat yourself up if you've missed one or two of the text messages. Remember some of the suggestions will take time to put into practice. We're all here to support and help each other not to lay guilt trips on one other. I have a few to catch up with myself and I intend to follow them up. unity Life has been quite busy over the past few days and I must confess I enjoy getting a chance to chill out on a Friday evening. The thing is when your a minister the weekend is the time that you begin to wind your self up as you prepare for the Sunday services. Most ministers in the Church have one service to prepare, however because we have kept our Evening Service it means two sermons have to be written. So when everyone else is winding down on a Saturday my mind is usually reflecting and compiling the sermon. I've tried having it all prepared by Wednesday, but you know what, I found when it came to Sunday it felt as though I was heating up last weeks dinner. I guess for my style of preaching I like to have the ideas current in my head. It doesn't mean to say that the sermon is a last minute rush, I like to plan all the themes and Bible readings well in advance. I guess I just like pulling it all together on Saturday morning and evening and checking it over again on Sunday morning. 1087_35_52-general-assembly-hall-of-the-church-of-scotland-edinburgh_web Next week is going to be a pretty full one with the General Assembly starting on Wednesday morning. This is the first time they have moved the Assembly to start midweek. Our team from Sanctus Media of course will be there streaming the Assembly out as usual. So if you go to the Church of Scotland web page you'll be able to get live coverage and even a summary of the days events. However I believe the controversial case concerning Scott Rennie will not be streamed out on the web. We are living in challenging times and all of us who are in leadership in the church have a responsibility to seek the unity of the church. This is not to say that we cannot speak out our mind clearly, but it does mean that we need to be measured in the language we use. The media just love it when clerics get angry with each other and they love making the angry people look ridiculous. My advice to everyone taking part in the debates concerning homosexuality is this, don't allow yourself to be made into a caricature regardless of the point of view you hold. Remember we all claim to be part of God's family. You will never win your opponent over by making him or her look small. You will never change the mind of someone you disagree with if you don't spend time in their company listening to them. And yes it is possible for friends to disagree. Indeed non of us in the church are enemies, and if Jesus commands us to love our enemies, surely he expects us to be loving to each other, even if that involves discipline. moderator-3 I well remember Alan MacDonald when he was Moderator commending the Commissioners to go for a coffee with someone who had a completely different theological perspective. Make a friend of someone who holds a differing viewpoint. Most people know that I have a pretty conservative view of what is appropriate behaviour when it comes to sexual orientation, however I feel it is right and courteous to listen and learn from those who have a different view. I have discovered from experience over the years that there is a great deal of fear that seems to come over people when we are confronted with issues and people who challenge our understanding of the truth. You know what when the debates are going on in the Assembly Hall I'll be whispering under my breath " Perfect love casts out all fear" I pray that what ever happens non of us will be gripped by fear but that the love of God will be spread abroad in our hearts. Difficult choices means that we will never all agree on specifics especially when it comes to sexual orientation. Those of us who hold to more traditional viewpoints need to realise that the world around has adopted a different view on this issue. It is not enough to simply quote scripture. The secular world has moved the whole debate on to the point where many no longer believe there is an issue to debate. We need to explore perhaps with others who hold a more liberal view say on homosexuality, where it is they draw the line of appropriateness, for they will have a line. Especially when it comes to other relationships of a sexual nature within family units. The question then has to be asked by all of us, why is it that we find one type of relationship among the sexes appropriate and another inappropriate? What is it that makes a sexual relationship inappropriate? When we find the answers to these questions we may well be able to express ourselves more clearly to one another. And perhaps realise that a loving relationship is not enough to establish appropriateness.
5 Comments
avatar

Posted By: Helmut   On: 20 May 2009   At: 7:43pm

It made me read again all of Leviticus: american red letter King James (for once I got almost completely lost - usually the king James version is no problem to me), German (revised, but not modern, Luther edition), German “Jeans” edition (short edition). Just reading all of Leviticus in different version (possibly equally far from what was said in various styles of Hebrew) made me think and consider. Reading all of it should humble us in respect to the argument at hand.

avatar

Posted By: David   On: 20 May 2009   At: 9:05am

Albert thanks for this thoughtful post. As always a helpful tone…but I also think your last paragraph in many ways gets to the nub of the issue….everyone in this debate agrees that there are inappropriate expressions of sexuality - we just don’t agree where those begin. For me I think the Genesis text in particular suggest that formative in shaping where appropriateness lies are the two ideas of commitment and complementarity. We’re whole people so we shouldn’t make ourselves physically vulnerable - in sexual activity - without making ourselves emotionally, economically,spiritually vulnerable as well. (Commitment). And within the word ‘Suitable’ in Genesis 2 is a paradoxical idea ‘Like-opposite’. We’re made for ‘like-oppositeness’ (Complementarity).

Praying on.

avatar

Posted By: italker   On: 16 May 2009   At: 9:38am

Hazel,

Try not to feel too miserable. The interpretation of scripture is not an easy thing with which to grapple. Many godly people have differed over the interpretation of verses. There is no perfect community of believers. The very fact that we read a translation of a verse means that we are in the hands of the interpreters. It really is more complicated than might be een at first. however all that aside, I’m challenged by what I know everyone agrees about in scripture and that alone is enough for me to be getting on with. The rest I will struggle with but hold to what I believe to be the faith handed down to me. We journey together with all our failings and failures inviting the Holy Spirit to lead us into all truth for non of us have grasped the whole truth.

avatar

Posted By: Gordon Kennedy   On: 16 May 2009   At: 9:25am

Thanks Albert. We should all quote ‘Love one another’ more often than we chant ‘sola Scriptura’.

avatar

Posted By: Hazel   On: 16 May 2009   At: 7:27am

Thanks, I find that helpful. Must confess to wondering for quite a long time now that if one verse, or section,  in Leviticus is now not applicable why not none of them then. Where would that lead? I know the whole subject (not just of sexual orientation) makes me miserable - the root seems to be the authority of scripture being questioned by people who love Jesus- maybe, perhaps? all so vague.

Leave a reply